Meyered In No Man’s Land: Can a Trek Legend Bring Us Back to the Good Times?

By Ciarán McNulty

I first became aware of Nicholas Meyer back in 2002, when I got hold of the collector’s edition DVD of Wrath of Khan.
Aside from being aware of the Trek actors occasionally hopping into the director’s chair, at that point I hadn’t given much thought to the folks who helmed the movie outings.
But then, in this DVD’s special features there were interviews and commentary with this droll, funny, even prickly middle-aged man, who 20 years earlier had stomped onto the set of the Wrath of Khan as a relatively young upstart.
Very soon, as I became aware of his name cropping up as a writing credit on Voyage Home and noticed him returning to the director’s chair for Undiscovered Country, the man’s Midas Touch when it came to Star Trek was all too evident. Whilst I’ve never given credence to the snarky, hipster nerd opinion that only the even numbered Trek flicks are good, it did seem clear to me that the ones where Meyer had any involvement were always a cut above the rest.

1106416_orig

THE HITS KEEP COMING: Meyer was Star Trek’s golden boy in the 80s.

His bravado in raging into Gene Roddenberry’s world and sort of throwing away the bible in a manner, could be compared to JJ Abrams’ approach to his additions to the world of Star Trek. Yet why do I feel a horrid sick feeling in my stomach and a sense of personal insult when confronted with Abrams’ changes, whilst to this day, I hail Meyer’s cavalier approach to the series’ style and canon as so heroicly inventive?
Well for one, he didn’t entirely throw away the guts of Star Trek’s high sci-fi concepts and socio-political allegories (in fact he revelled in the latter) and secondly, the changes he made were somewhat necessary. Namely in regards to action.
Yes, the Abrams stuff gets labelled the most action-packed and it’s normally a guy like me who complains at its use at the expense of story but Meyer introduced just enough. Enough that he really allowed Trek- and specifically these spaceships we would see in near-pornographic slow-mo all the time- to finally “let their balls hang out there”, to use the parlance of Horatio Hornblower.*

The Motion Picture’s huge scientific concepts and stern-faced contemplation of them would’ve been an interesting 40-50 minutes of TV but for our beloved crew’s first big budget outing on the silver screen, it’s pretty rough-going. Meyer identified the need for a few buckles to be thoroughly swashed as he approached Trek as Horatio Hornblower in space. A concept not that far removed from Trek, as Roddenberry had indeed grown up, obsessed with those very books.
I laughed recently watching Comic Book Girl 19’s YouTube review of Fake Trek Into Lens Flares, where after a few “OMG”s and thorough recommendations to go see the most hated of all Trek movies, she declares(at 14:38) that Wrath of Khan is slow! Oh my. So, just how short is the attention span of the average youtube-authenticated movie expert?

Well, slow it ain’t. Is it motivated by where the next explosion’s coming from? No. Is it character-driven? Hell yes. But this thing put naval battles in space, man! There’s genius in Meyer’s levelling the playing field by hiding starships in a nebula so sensory equipment and even viewscreens were useless, reducing the battle to the sort of tense, nail-biting duel that logic dictates simply wouldn’t happen in the 23rd century.

inspiration_for_battle_of_the_mutara_nebula_by_madcapal-d66hilz

MUTARA NEBULA: Spaceship porn goes up a notch….I mean it really escalates quickly.

And that’s the joy of Meyer’s attitude to the suspension of disbelief. He throws in a montage of crewmen crowbarring floor-panelling apart on the Enterprise to manually load a photon torpedo for firing- something he admits in the commentary would be pointless- but it doesn’t matter coz it’s a great visual and adds to the momentum of the scene. A momentum clearly lost on internet-educated film reviewers born years after the fall of the Berlin wall.

 

Hmm. The Berlin Wall. That was an interesting time. I recall being about 4 years old as it came down, and not really understanding what it all meant. But luckily, Nicholas Meyer and Star Trek came along to explain it all….with Klingons!

Praxis_effect

PRAXIS: A metaphor for Chernobyl.

The metaphor of an exploding moon representing Chernobyl and the near-collapse of the Klingon Empire representing the USSR, helped me understand the Cold War before I even knew what any of these things were. Of course, I wouldn’t really fall in love with the movie for about another 10 or 12 years but boy, is this a Trek flick to sink your teeth into. Political intrigue! Captains racing so hard against time they threaten to fly their ships apart! Christopher Plummer chewing up Shakespearean lines! It’s. The. Tits. Light up a cigarette. Nicholas Meyer just gave you great Star Trek. Usually you pay double for that, but he’s a classy guy.

 

Between these two directorial efforts, he penned the middle section of Voyage Home, wherein Harve Bennett’s writing stops once they travel back in time and resumes once they return. So Meyer is the scribe who gave us most of the fun stuff in 1986 San Francisco, although it must be noted Steve Meerson and Peter Krikes worked on drafts- I’m just not sure whether their generation of the script was before or after Meyer’s.nuclear-wessels

So, as far as Trek goes, Meyer is my guy. Meyer’s right there with Ronald D. Moore, Brannon Braga, Manny Coto and Ira Steven Behr as guys who have really thrilled me with Trek stories through the years and frankly he’s my favourite of them. And so we come to some recent news.

Nicholas Meyer will be involved in the CBS Star Trek show set for 2017. He will be a consulting producer and some sources are already tentatively crediting him as a writer- though take that with several grains of salt.

j-j-abrams-lens-flare_thumb2

No….Just…No.

What will this mean? Well, the sad thing for me and I’m sure many like me is that I just haven’t mustered up any excitement for this series. For me, the last bit of Star Trek we got was back in 2005, with a disappointing Enterprise finale. It slumbered for a few years before finally being killed in it’s sleep by a spectacled, lens flare-obsessed Star Wars fan who, damage done to Trek, rode off on his merry way once he got the keys to the kingdom he’d actually been after all along. He left a Star Trek franchise stranded in continuity no man’s land, where the 40 years of beloved canon that had been pain-stakingly put together to our delight, was sadly now thrown aside as old stories were polished off and made sexier, dumber and soulless.

As a result, the cynic in me finds it hard to believe that the bigwigs would now decide to go back into the original world and continue the story. And that means that even with a Star Trek great like Meyer given some sort of role(ceremonial or participatory), I doubt it will make me happy. As I said, what has been the man’s strength in the past is his ability to cast tradition and continuity aside for the sake of story and that means he might happily go along with an alternative continuity- one that might actually be very well written but that simply won’t be the Star Trek I’ve known and loved.

The news has, however, given me a glimmer of hope. Nowadays with Trek, I first want continuity taken care of, then I want story quality attended to. But I at least know that, with Meyer involved, we definitely have a good shot at the second one.

*- Horatio Hornblower never said that

Advertisements

One thought on “Meyered In No Man’s Land: Can a Trek Legend Bring Us Back to the Good Times?

  1. Great article Ciarán. I’m ambivalent about the new series myself given that Kurtzman is involved (he’s partly responsible for the new movies) and the fact that CBS are wetting themselves at the prospect of all the lovely Star Trek fans they’ll be getting to sign up to their subscription service. Money is their bottom line rather than content. Netflix wanted to make the new series. CBS said no. Netflix understands that great programming brings in the punters. CBS’ business policy is backwards.

    The new series won’t be set in the JJverse/new timeline for one very simple reason: JJTrek merchandise doesn’t sell, whereas $20 million worth of Prime Universe stuff is sold every year. So, if that’s where the money is, that’s where the series will be set. In any case, Bad Reboot (ahem, Bad Robot) owns rights to the new timeline so there’s no money in it for CBS anyway.

    My bet is that the new series will be set between ST: Enterprise and ST: TOS. The “Enterprise” is a brand and a hook, so I think the series will revolve around that ship and it’ll be captained by Robert April or Christopher Pike. Setting it in this era would also be one of the reasons CBS & Paramount are going after the independent Axanar movie so hard – they don’t want the competition.

    Plan B for me would be a series set after ST: The Undiscovered Country and before The Next Gen, probably on the Enterprise-B.

    Both eras have political shenanigans going on with the Klingons and/or Romulans which plays into the kind of stuff Meyer likes to write about. I don’t think we’ll see a post-TNG set series.

    Of course, given how the new movies have muddied the continuity waters, setting the series on a ship other than Enterprise might be a smart move and provide something of a fresh start.

    What I don’t want to see is a dark series – that approach killed off the Stargate franchise. Star Trek is unique in portraying an optimistic future for mankind instead of yet another dystopian one. It needs to keep that core value. And it needs to put the exploration back into the franchise as well, something that only reappeared in ST: Enterprise (whatever else you may think of that series).

    One thing’s clear: whatever we get, some will love it and some will hate it. Too many variations of Trek over the decades means that not all fans will be happy with the new series.

    The question that remains is: will there be enough fans who like the new series and who are willing to pay to see it to make it successful enough for CBS to continue it into Season 2 and beyond?

    I think their own greed got the better of them and the series would have had a much better and brighter future on Netflix.

    Interesting times ahead. 🙂

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s